Johann Peter Murmann Writings on China
Jiang, Hong; Murmann, Johann Peter The Rise of China's Digital Economy: An Overview Journal Article In: Management and Organization Review, 18 (4), pp. 790–802, 2022. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: China, Innovation Hochstrasser, Annika; Murmann, Johann Peter China Innovation Capacity Growth Index 2015 and 2020 Journal Article In: Management and Organization Review, 17 (4), pp. 861-867, 2021. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Innovation, Innovation Index Li, Lanhua; Guo, Bin; Murmann, Johann Peter; Wu, Dong Huawei’s R&D Management Transformation Book Chapter In: Wu, Xiaobo; Murmann, Johann Peter; Huang, Can; Guo, Bin (Ed.): The Management Transformation of Huawei: From Humble Beginnings to Global Leadership, Chapter 8, pp. 292–346, Cambridge University Press, 2020. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Change, Dynamic Capabilities, Huawei, Innovation, R&D, Routines Murmann, Johann Peter; Huang, Can; Zhang, Haoyu Huawei’s Intellectual Property Management Transformation Book Chapter In: Wu, Xiaobo; Murmann, Johann Peter; Huang, Can; Guo, Bin (Ed.): The Management Transformation of Huawei: From Humble Beginnings to Global Leadership, Chapter 9, pp. 347–380, Cambridge University Press, 2020. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Change, Huawei, Innovation, IP, Patents Perkins, Greg; Murmann, Johann Peter What Does the Success of Tesla Mean for the Future Dynamics in the Global Automobile Sector? Journal Article In: Management and Organization Review, 14 (3), pp. 471–480, 2018. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: autos, Innovation, Tesla Lewin, Arie Y.; Kenney, Martin; Murmann, Johann Peter (Ed.) China's Innovation Challenge: Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap Book Cambridge University Press, 2016. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Innovation Lewin, Arie Y.; Kenney, Martin; Murmann, Johann Peter China’s innovation challenge: An introduction Book Chapter In: Lewin, Arie Y.; Kenney, Martin; Murmann, Johann Peter (Ed.): China's Innovation Challenge: Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap, Chapter 10, pp. 1–31, Cambridge University Press, 2016. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Innovation Lewin, Arie Y.; Kenney, Martin; Murmann, Johann Peter China’s innovation challenge: Concluding reflections Book Chapter In: Lewin, Arie Y.; Kenney, Martin; Murmann, Johann PeterEditors (Ed.): China's Innovation Challenge: Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap, Chapter 16, pp. 418–425, Cambridge University Press, 2016. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Innovation, Innovation Index Murmann, Johann Peter China’s Path to Innovation by Xiaolan Fu Online 2015, visited: 28.07.2015. Abstract | Links | BibTeX | Tags: Innovation2022
@article{jiang_murmann_2022b,
title = {The Rise of China's Digital Economy: An Overview},
author = {Hong Jiang and Johann Peter Murmann},
url = {https://u.pcloud.link/publink/show?code=XZdrWSVZ00bHtvQxTW7YQQalH06dKJXL3Loy},
doi = {10.1017/mor.2022.32},
year = {2022},
date = {2022-01-01},
urldate = {2022-01-01},
journal = {Management and Organization Review},
volume = {18},
number = {4},
pages = {790–802},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
abstract = {To stimulate a debate about the rise of China's digital economy, this essay compares China and the US in one key area of the digital economy – e-commerce and internet-based services. China still lags behind the US in internet penetration, but it distinguishes itself by building a mobile-first, fiber-intensive, and inclusive digital infrastructure. A favorable infrastructure, innovations tailored to the large Chinese market, and local firms’ rapid commercialization of products and services turned the world's largest domestic population into active online consumers, helping China overtake the US by a large margin in retail e-commerce and digital payment. While China translated digital technologies into leading business-to-customer and customer-to-customer businesses, it has not been so successful in business-to-business services. The US is still ahead in the general-purpose technologies underlying the digital economy.},
keywords = {China, Innovation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2021
@article{hochstrasser_murmann_2021,
title = {China Innovation Capacity Growth Index 2015 and 2020},
author = {Annika Hochstrasser and Johann Peter Murmann},
doi = {10.1017/mor.2021.59},
year = {2021},
date = {2021-01-01},
urldate = {2021-01-01},
journal = {Management and Organization Review},
volume = {17},
number = {4},
pages = {861-867},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
abstract = {It is of interest in China and across the world to predict whether China will catch up with the most economically advanced nations in innovation capacity. To facilitate an ongoing assessment of China's innovation capacity, the article develops a China Innovation Capacity Growth Index composed of eight separate measures. China's performance in 2020 is compared to the baseline from 2015, showing that China has progressed in six of the eight measures. This article and the accompanying Technical Appendix explain each of the measures, including the sources for the data, and report the changes in performance over time.},
keywords = {Innovation, Innovation Index},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2020
@inbook{li_guo_murmann_wu_wu_murmann_huang_guo_2020,
title = {Huawei’s R&D Management Transformation},
author = {Lanhua Li and Bin Guo and Johann Peter Murmann and Dong Wu },
editor = { Xiaobo Wu and Johann Peter Murmann and Can Huang and Bin Guo},
doi = {10.1017/9781108550987.009},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
urldate = {2020-01-01},
booktitle = {The Management Transformation of Huawei: From Humble Beginnings to Global Leadership},
pages = {292–346},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
chapter = {8},
abstract = {Although Huawei started its business as a small agent in 1987, the firm began the independent development of telecommunications equipment in its fouth year of operation and then gradually increased its R&D investments over the years. As the scale of R&D efforts increased, Huawei encountered significant problems with its organization of R&D and felt that it was necessary to transform how it conducts R&D several times over its thirty-year history. In this chapter, we develop a four-step model to analyze three major R&D management transformations in Huawei’s long history of R&D activities. The first transformation, from 1991 to 1995, helped Huawei to establish an informal R&D system; the second transformation, from 1995 to 1998, changed the informal R&D management system into a formal system with clear structures and processes; and finally, the third transformation built up a process-oriented, high-performing R&D organization. We find that although the transformations shifted Huawei’s focus from making structural changes to process changes, all of them were closely aligned with the firm’s market position and with its strategic re-orientation.},
keywords = {Change, Dynamic Capabilities, Huawei, Innovation, R&D, Routines},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
@inbook{murmann_huang_zhang_wu_murmann_huang_guo_2020,
title = {Huawei’s Intellectual Property Management Transformation},
author = {Johann Peter Murmann and Can Huang and Haoyu Zhang },
editor = {Xiaobo Wu and Johann Peter Murmann and Can Huang and Bin Guo},
doi = {10.1017/9781108550987.010},
year = {2020},
date = {2020-01-01},
urldate = {2020-01-01},
booktitle = {The Management Transformation of Huawei: From Humble Beginnings to Global Leadership},
pages = {347–380},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
chapter = {9},
abstract = {Huawei by 2014 had become the largest patent filer in the world even though it did not file any patents for the first eight years of its existence (1987–1994). This chapter examines the development of the firm’s intellectual property (IP) management capability. It describes important changes that Huawei undertook both in terms of its IP strategy (whether, when, where, and in what technical areas to patent) and the administration of its IP activities. Unlike the other major transformations that Huawei undertook with the help of Western consulting firms, Huawei could not make up its mind about how it was going to manage its IP strategy until a lawsuit filed in 2003 by a US competitor, Cisco, prompted top management to devote significant attention to this area. To support its internationalization strategy, Huawei subsequently implemented a systematic strategy to create a vast collection of independent intellectual property in telecommunication technology. Starting in 2003, Huawei embarked on a series of five-year plans, first to increase the amount of IP that would be generated by its large R&D efforts and later to increase the quality of its IP. To realize this strategy, large changes in the organization of the IP office had to be made. Huawei now employs over 400 full-time IP professionals to implement its IP strategies. Huawei offers lessons for other companies from emerging economies who want to compete successfully on the world market.},
keywords = {Change, Huawei, Innovation, IP, Patents},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2018
@article{perkins_murmann_2018,
title = {What Does the Success of Tesla Mean for the Future Dynamics in the Global Automobile Sector?},
author = {Greg Perkins and Johann Peter Murmann},
doi = {10.1017/mor.2018.31},
year = {2018},
date = {2018-01-01},
urldate = {2018-01-01},
journal = {Management and Organization Review},
volume = {14},
number = {3},
pages = {471–480},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
abstract = {After reading Jacobides, MacDuffie, and Tae (2016), the success of Tesla in launching a new automobile company in a crowded sector puzzled us. Jacobides, MacDuffie, and Tae (2016) had convinced us that developing the capabilities to become the manufacturer of a complete, safe automobile system would be quite difficult. Researching the development history of Tesla, we have pieced together the key features of how Tesla achieved its successful entry into the automobile sector. From this we have concluded, based on the development time and costs associated with the Tesla Model S, that a well-funded company could develop a new electric vehicle (EV) from scratch and move it into production within 3 to 5 years, by spending $1–2 billion of capital for design, development, and manufacturing. Without a doubt, increasing production to the levels of mass producers would take much longer, but the Telsa example demonstrates that new entry into the industy has become feasible. Tesla’s trajectory, from start-up on the brink of bankruptcy to a company mass producing electric vehicles within 5 years, raises important questions about the future of the global automobile sector. What would prevent Apple and Google, two companies that clearly have the resources to fund $2B in R&D, from entering the market and contesting fiercely with the dominant OEMs such as GM, Ford, VW, Mercedes, and Toyota? There are already many ventures in the Chinese electric automobile sector, such as BYD, Qiantu, NIO, and many more. Inspired by the success of Tesla, why would Chinese software and internet giants such as Tencent and Alibaba not enter this large market given that Tesla did not have prior experience and was able to get a successful car ready for sale within 5 years? In this perspective piece, we offer our reflections on the implications of the success of Tesla for the dynamics of the global automobile sector. We will appraise the chances that Chinese firms will for the first time become leading players in pushing the frontier of automotive technology, a goal that has eluded them over the past 30 years despite massive government efforts to create strong home-grown auto companies.},
keywords = {autos, Innovation, Tesla},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {article}
}
2016
@book{lewin_kenney_murmann_2016,
title = {China's Innovation Challenge: Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap},
editor = {Arie Y. Lewin and Martin Kenney and Johann Peter Murmann},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781316422267},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2016-01-01},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
abstract = {The miracle growth of the Chinese economy has decreased from a compound annual growth rate of 10% to less than 7% in 2015. The two engines of growth - export on a scale never before witnessed and massive infrastructure investments - are reaching the point of diminishing returns. This poses the central question which is explored in this book - can China escape the middle-income trap? Assuming current political arrangements remain unchanged and that it does not or cannot adopt Western sociopolitical economic regimes, can China develop an indigenous growth model centered on innovation? This compilation gathers leading Chinese and other international scholars to consider the daunting challenges and complexities of building an innovation-driven Chinese growth model. Providing several comprehensive perspectives, it examines key areas such as the institutional system, technology, sociocultural forces and national policy. The analyses and their conclusions range from strong optimism to deep pessimism about China's future.},
keywords = {Innovation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {book}
}
@inbook{lewin_kenney_murmann_2016b,
title = {China’s innovation challenge: An introduction},
author = {Arie Y. Lewin and Martin Kenney and Johann Peter Murmann},
editor = {Arie Y. Lewin and Martin Kenney and Johann Peter Murmann},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781316422267.002},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2016-01-01},
booktitle = {China's Innovation Challenge: Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap},
pages = {1–31},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
chapter = {10},
abstract = {The current Chinese development model is nearing its limits. The World Bank has cautioned that China could find itself in a “middle-income trap”. China recognizes that it must dramatically increase its capacity for innovation to avoid this trap. This chapter provides an introduction to the enormous complexities and challenges that China faces in transforming the diverse resources available to it for creating an innovation-based economy. It describes how China has over the past four decades developed from being largely isolated and irrelevant to the world economy to becoming the world’s second-largest economy. The chapter lays out two diametrically opposed scenarios for the future development of the Chinese economy. The first, optimistic scenario argues that China can build ever-stronger innovation capability and become a high-income nation. The second, more pessimistic scenario makes the case that, without radical reforms, existing Chinese political and economic institutions will inexorably relegate China to the middle-income trap. The chapter also introduces 14 essays by leading international scholars that collectively discuss with frankness the opportunities and challenges China faces across the different aspects of its society. It does so this by sketching the role of institutions, history, politics, culture, and competition in shaping the attitudes and capacities of individuals, firms, and entire sectors to become more innovative. },
keywords = {Innovation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
@inbook{lewin_kenney_murmann_2016c,
title = {China’s innovation challenge: Concluding reflections},
author = {Arie Y. Lewin and Martin Kenney and Johann Peter Murmann},
editor = {Arie Y. Lewin and Martin Kenney and Johann PeterEditors Murmann},
doi = {10.1017/CBO9781316422267.017},
year = {2016},
date = {2016-01-01},
urldate = {2016-01-01},
booktitle = {China's Innovation Challenge: Overcoming the Middle-Income Trap},
pages = {418–425},
publisher = {Cambridge University Press},
chapter = {16},
abstract = {The chapter reflects on China’s dramatic economic achievements over the past four decades and the complex task that policy makers face in continuing China’s progress toward attaining a high-income economy. It argues that, even though no one can predict with any certainty today whether China will continue its growth path or fall into the middle-income trap, it will become increasingly clear in the years to come whether the optimistic or the pessimistic outlook on China’s ability to develop an innovative economy turns out to be correct. The best way to gauge Chinese progress is to track a few salient indicators and compile a “Chinese Innovation Capacity Growth Dashboard.” The proposed indicators include the effectiveness of its intellectual property system, its R&D resource allocation, and its exploitation of foreign R&D assets; the share of resources flowing to state-owned enterprises, of new-to-world innovations, and of papers in leading scientific journals; the ease of starting new firms; the level of financing for startups and small and medium-size enterprises; the autonomy of Chinese universities; and institutionalized trust.},
keywords = {Innovation, Innovation Index},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {inbook}
}
2015
@online{nokey,
title = {China’s Path to Innovation by Xiaolan Fu},
author = {Johann Peter Murmann},
url = {http://www.economic-evolution.net/index.php/weblog/booksandreviewsfull/322},
year = {2015},
date = {2015-07-28},
urldate = {2015-07-28},
abstract = {China's economic development is one of the great stories of our time. Today (July 28, 2015) we are starting our special focus on China with a review new book on the development of China's innovative capacity. China's Path to Innovation written by the Oxford Professor Xiaolan Fu. Although a new trade press book seems to come out almost every week on China's innovative capacity, there are relatively few scholarly treatments on the subjects. For this reason, Xiaolan Fu’s book China's Path to Innovation (Cambridge University Press, 2015) is a welcome addition to the literature.
},
keywords = {Innovation},
pubstate = {published},
tppubtype = {online}
}